Escalate late approvals, open follow-ups, remind reviewers. Every one is ready to run, and you can adjust it in plain language.
Send makers marked PDF fixes and the next proof deadline in chat.
Your maker sees linked PDF marks and the next proof deadline in chat. Your approval task keeps the same fixes.
Share both proof revisions in chat and hold the review for your decision.
Your coordinator gets both revision links in chat when the task and current proof differ, with the task held for a human choice.
Check proof access before handing off a visual review.
See whether your reviewer has direct access to a proof before you ask for feedback, right in the conversation where you asked.
Confirm the current proof in each chat review request.
Your proof requests get a clear reply in the same conversation. Your team sees what is ready and what needs fixing.
Flag visual proof links that expire before their review deadlines.
Your review tasks show proof link problems before the deadline, so you can renew access before a reviewer opens the file.
Flag visual proof tasks that still link to an older file.
Your reviewers get the newer file link on their approval tasks when a review still points to an older version.
Return revised proofs to reviewers with fresh due dates.
Your review table shows corrected proofs and new due dates after each workday folder sweep.
Flag older artwork links before visual proof reviews.
Your reviewers see whether a task links to the latest file, with the newer link in a comment when the task points to an old draft.
Keep proof review cards current on access through the due date.
Your review cards show whether a reviewer's proof grant lasts through the deadline, so you can spot access problems before a decision is due.
Flag outdated proofs and request the current file.
Your reviewers can decide on the intended creative file. The Agent flags outdated versions and asks the owner for the current one.
Show what each artwork proof still needs before creative review.
See whether a newly filed proof has what a reviewer needs, with missing details listed on its library entry.
Reopen the review task and point the reviewer to the new proof.
Your reviewer gets a task ready to review, with the replacement proof and its version named in a comment.