Close signed tasks, open follow-ups, carry revision notes. Every one is ready to run, and you can adjust it in plain language.
Share both proof revisions in chat and hold the review for your decision.
Your coordinator gets both revision links in chat when the task and current proof differ, with the task held for a human choice.
Turn proof chat changes into fix tasks for the right maker.
Your maker gets fix tasks tied to the reviewer’s message and proof version, so requested changes stay with the right work.
Replace old proof links and reopen tasks for another review.
Your reviewer finds the latest proof in a reopened task. The due date and maker's chat link give them a clear path back.
Give each uploaded proof a reviewer task and direct message.
Your reviewers get the proof and a clear question in chat, with an assigned task to track the deadline and delivered request.
Put the current proof revision and reviewer due date on each task.
Your review tasks show the current image revision and reviewer due date, so the next handoff is clear.
Post grouped PDF fixes for the maker on the reviewed version.
Your maker gets the fixes in the review task, tied to the PDF version your reviewer marked up.
Link rejected proofs to designer tasks with version-specific comments.
Your designer gets the changes reviewers requested, tied to the rejected file version, with a link back to the approval.
Request review for the right proof revision after prep is complete.
Your reviewers hear about the right proof after its file matches the task and your preparation checks are complete.
Update proof links and note who reviewed the earlier version.
Your review tasks point to the latest proof, with a comment naming who saw the previous version so the next handoff stays clear.
Turn reviewer comments into fix tasks tied to the reviewed proof.
Your maker gets clear fix subtasks tied to the proof the reviewer saw, so the next round starts with the right version.
Alert you when a proof revision conflicts with its review title.
Keep proof reviews clear: your coordinator sees conflicting revisions on the issue and can choose which one belongs in review.
Prepare the review task with the current proof and decision question.
Your reviewers get a clear task for the current proof. They know what decision to make and when it is due.