Pass on decisions, carry revision notes, open supplier setup. Every one is ready to run, and you can adjust it in plain language.
Attach marked campaign proofs to the right creative task.
Your maker gets the marked PDF and a clear fix list on the right task, with the reviewed version named.
Add emailed reviewer edits to the right campaign asset task.
Your campaign team gets a revision subtask from reviewer email, linked to the asset task and carrying the requested edits.
Send each ready asset to its reviewer and log the handoff.
Your reviewer gets the current asset with a clear request, and your campaign task keeps the handoff in view.
Turn campaign proof feedback into tasks tied to the reviewed file.
Your maker gets fix tasks tied to the reviewer’s message and proof version, so requested changes stay with the right work.
Hand off ready campaign creative to its reviewer in chat.
Your named reviewer gets the asset and question in chat when your campaign task is ready for review.
Put the current creative file in the campaign sign-off task.
Your brand reviewer gets the current campaign draft and the decision needed together on the review task.
Route marked campaign proofs to the maker for revision.
Your maker gets the fixes in the review task, tied to the PDF version your reviewer marked up.
Point campaign review tasks to the latest proof.
Your review tasks point to the latest proof, with a comment naming who saw the previous version so the next handoff stays clear.
Attach the current campaign proof to its review task.
Your reviewer sees the current image or PDF proof link and revision on the task before deciding.
Route rejected campaign files to designers with reviewer notes.
Your designer gets the changes reviewers requested, tied to the rejected file version, with a link back to the approval.
Assign rejected campaign assets to their creators with review feedback.
Creators get a linked revision task with review feedback, so your campaign lead can keep work moving without chasing handoffs.
Put revised campaign creative back before its reviewer.
Your reviewer gets a task ready to review, with the replacement proof and its version named in a comment.