Check requests, surface missing proof, chase decisions. Every one is ready to run, and you can adjust it in plain language.
Email the current creative proof and note the revision sent.
Your reviewer gets the current image or PDF and a clear question. Your review card shows which revision you sent.
Put each emailed draft where the creative team reviews it.
Your reviewers find campaign drafts right on their review tasks. A comment shows which version came from email.
Keep each artwork decision with the exact proof reviewed.
Your review cards show who made a proof decision and which file they saw. The reply time stays with the decision.
Email current creative proofs to reviewers with a decision deadline.
Your reviewer gets the current proof and a clear decision deadline by email when a card is ready for review.
Flag proof mismatches before creative reviews move ahead.
Your coordinator gets both revision links in chat when the task and current proof differ, with the task held for a human choice.
Send makers marked PDF revisions with the next proof deadline.
Your maker sees linked PDF marks and the next proof deadline in chat. Your approval task keeps the same fixes.
Keep each visual proof tied to its current revision and review date.
Your review tasks show the current image revision and reviewer due date, so the next handoff is clear.
Check client access to the current proof before feedback begins.
See whether your client has access to the current proof before the review moves forward, with the answer on the task.
Send PDF review marks to the maker on the right proof.
Your maker gets the fixes in the review task, tied to the PDF version your reviewer marked up.
Keep creative decisions tied to the proof version reviewed.
Your proof tasks show who decided, which file version they reviewed, and who takes the next step.
Send rejected artwork back to its maker with the review reason.
Your makers find rejected proofs in their rework list. The reviewed version and reason stay visible on the card.
Send rejected artwork back to its maker with the review notes.
Your original maker gets the rework task and sees why the reviewer rejected the proof, with the reason tied to the reviewed file.