AI-Agents for Research Analysts in Evidence Checking
Check purchase facts, compare invoices, request missing proof. Every one is ready to run, and you can adjust it in plain language.
Compile requested webpage findings into a source-linked table.
Your research findings arrive in a source-linked table, with missing facts and unreadable pages clearly marked.
11 toolsAnswer colleague questions from shared research files and cite the sources.
Your teammates get answers in the same chat conversation, with document names they can check for themselves.
12 toolsTurn video transcripts into cited briefs for research requests.
Your team gets a short answer with video links and claims to check, without digging through long transcripts.
8 toolsAnswer research requests with sourced findings and open questions.
Get a sourced answer in your team's question thread, with links to the pages read and a clear note where evidence conflicts.
8 toolsTrace brief findings to source files and page references.
Get a concise research brief with source references, an editable DOCX, and a matching PDF for review.
Compare study populations and findings with source links.
Your literature matrix gains sourced study details as your team marks reading-list items Ready, with gaps flagged for review.
4 toolsAnswer source questions in team threads with page-backed findings.
Get brief answers beside shared links, with the source page included and a clear note when a page can't be read.
Compare funding announcements and flag conflicting claims.
Your watchlist gains a sourced funding brief when you add a company, with the latest announced round and gaps flagged for review.
Compare sources and email cited answers to colleagues' questions.
Your colleagues get cited research reports in the original email thread. Supporting evidence and open questions stay visible.
Extract requested facts from webpages into a cited table.
Your webpage research requests become source-linked tables, with missing details and pages that failed to load clearly marked.
